|
|
Post by robotmarble on Feb 28, 2007 20:32:22 GMT
Multiplayer is now for MBP only... if we make a new file directory. So in the library instead of it taking from the MarbleBlast folder it will take from the MBP folder. Please do this or all our marble blastes' will be destroyed like mine. I salvadged my Prefs.cs and custom levels and resistalled the rest. If we can't get a new libray directory Multiplayer will be canceled.
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Feb 28, 2007 20:51:38 GMT
You don't have to get ALL of the code from the Library/MarbleBlast directory. Remember, you can do Ctrl-click > Show Package Contents on MBP  |
|
|
|
Post by robotmarble on Feb 28, 2007 20:53:16 GMT
No, but it saves it all there. It will destroy all Old MBGs and that would be alot of Blood on GMD's hands so we need a new one.
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 1, 2007 4:48:38 GMT
Oh ok I dunno.. |
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 1, 2007 4:49:56 GMT
I might make Diamond Seeking Fun - 8 players, 16 players, 32 players and maybe 64  EDIT: Also, how about people that know how to use QuArK only do multiplayer levels maybe, because I really don't want any 'accidental' glitches with stretching interiors  |
|
|
|
Post by Perishingflames on Mar 1, 2007 13:11:47 GMT
Yeah, only the quark guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lonestar on Mar 1, 2007 19:19:55 GMT
I don't stretch interiors. Can I make one? Please?
|
|
|
|
Post by robotmarble on Mar 1, 2007 20:04:46 GMT
I have a really good Idea for a Battle game. And We can do team games now that we have a few months to perfect it.
|
|
|
|
Post by robotmarble on Mar 1, 2007 20:06:10 GMT
Also, The Library isn't to important as long as everyone isn't woried about the Multiplayer Going to thier MBG too. I would still prefer a new one if we can. Lonestar can you do some fishing around?
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 1, 2007 20:29:11 GMT
Dibs Matan's team lol And Lonestar, I'd probably prefer you don't unless I, or Matan or Jase replicates it in QuArK |
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Mar 1, 2007 21:10:36 GMT
Yeah. We should still be able to design multiplayer levels, but you can replicate it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lonestar on Mar 1, 2007 21:18:24 GMT
Ok then. |
|
|
|
Post by Lonestar on Mar 2, 2007 15:42:54 GMT
Will the teleport still be functional with more than one marble?
|
|
|
|
Post by robotmarble on Mar 2, 2007 22:10:56 GMT
Yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Mar 6, 2007 1:49:01 GMT
Phil, I have to say I completley oppose to the idea that only QuArK guys can make multiplayer maps. Have you seen lonestars gem box? It's an awesome map, but is impossible to make in QuArK. (Unless you're really up for it.) We can have a rule of no scaling, but non QuArK gues should make multiplayer maps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lonestar on Mar 6, 2007 1:55:30 GMT
Well, if there's no Quark, (wich I would agree to) Gem Box needs some work. (I have some flashing textures and a streached interior) But yeah, would a single huge interior be any better than a normal level? And would it be worth the work?
|
|
